The problem with the BCS four team playoff - SCACCHoops.com

The problem with the BCS four team playoff

   Posted by All Sports Discussion at  4/27/2012 6:36:49 PM  |  Follow us on Twitter: @scacchoops
Discuss     Bookmark and Share

If you’ve read my blog in the past you know I’ve always been in favor of a +1 system. I’m ok with the 4-Team playoff as well. This week has left us with the near certainty that a 4 team playoff will exist.

ESPN is reporting that the proposed post-season plan would link the sites and conferences, the details of which are just now being discussed and probably won’t be finalized for months. As a fan I’m pretty satisfied with this. No system is perfect, and there will always be those disagree with whatever system is instituted, but a 4-team playoff?

Yea that’s ok with me. You get to keep the bowls which I like, you didn’t de-emphasize the regular the season, but you opened things up just enough that there should be less arguing about the national championship game participants. That said there is just one thing that scares me about the proposed playoff and it’s the possibility of larger playoff.

I had a conversation on twitter with  @KilroyFSU and @Jdubs88 that proved I’m not the only one concerned that a 4-Team playoff could eventually lead to the dreaded larger 8 or 16 team playoff. First the 8 and especially the 16 team playoff would dwarf any remaining bowls much the same way the NCAA basketball tournament does the NIT, but I don’t see the bowls surviving as the NIT has.

The bowls struggle as it is with attendance and this would be the final nail in the coffin. I still like the college football post-season not being so completely exclusive to only the best 8 or 16 teams in the country. I do think there are too many bowls, but overall I’m pro-Bowl.

I want the teams that play for national title that were the best over the course of 12-13 game season not just a team that gets hot for a couple of weeks. I can live with the number 4 team in the country beating number 1. I have a much hard time swallowing a number 8 and certainly a number 16 seed winning it all. The problem is once you get a 4-team playoff and if it’s successful, then there will be those that clamor for an 8 team playoff and then a 16 team playoff. They may argue there are too many teams from one conference or excluding quality 1 or 2 loss teams. Maybe a Boise St. finishes undefeated and ranked 5th or the playoff should be all major conferences and a couple of wildcards. Maybe the bigger playoff would be cash bonanza, and as we all know everything in big time college athletics is driven by $$$.  Can’t we keep some sense of amateurism? The big playoff is not for me.

Give me the top 4 teams regardless of where they come from, add 1 caveat that any undefeated team ranked in the top 8 will leap frog any one loss team. I think the odds of 5 undefeated teams will be rather low and quite rare. It will be easy. You keep winning and you’re in, lose and you roll the dice. I’m all for the 4-team playoff, but the potential for playoffs increasing is a big concern.

Become a fan of the ACC on Facebook and follow the ACC on Twitter.

 

This article was originally published at http://www.AllSportsDiscussion.com. If you are interested in sharing your website's content with SCACCHoops.com, Contact Us.

 

 

Post a Comment About this Article
Entry Link     0 Comment(s)
Subscribe  

There are currently no posts for this NewsBreaker


Post a Comment

Posting As:   Remember Me?
Subject:
Message:

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Search
Search
Advertisement
 
Poll
Should the ACC change their FB divs to setup a potential FSU/Clemson title game?
Yes
No
Dont Care


Newsbreakers
Looking Ahead to What UNC's Defense Will Be Facing
10/1/2014 2:16:38 PM
Tech-Savvy Jim Boeheim Sees a 'Different' Syracuse Basketball Team This Year
10/1/2014 2:16:10 PM
Louisville backup QB Reggie Bonnafon will start on Friday
10/1/2014 10:55:12 AM
Wake Forest vs. FSU: Depth Chart & Recruiting Differential
10/1/2014 10:54:23 AM
Syracuse: Freshman Naesean Howard No Longer Part of Program
10/1/2014 5:53:52 AM
Louisville Releases 2014-15 Men's Basketball Media Guide
9/30/2014 6:50:58 PM
Syracuse: Wayne Morgan Out, Kendall Moore & Ivan Foy 'Probably Doubtful'
9/30/2014 6:50:13 PM
Five Thoughts On The State Of The 2014 Louisville Football Team
9/30/2014 6:48:59 PM
UNC Opponent Preview: Virginia Tech
9/30/2014 6:48:15 PM
Pitt: No Cameron Wright, no problem
9/30/2014 11:46:05 AM
Wake Forest vs. Florida State: Statistical Preview
9/30/2014 11:45:35 AM
Will Gardner Returns To Practice, Status For Friday Still Unknown
9/30/2014 9:11:45 AM
Articles from around the ACC Blogosphere 9/29
9/29/2014 9:50:15 PM
Paul Chryst could consider Trey Anderson as option over Chad Voytik
9/29/2014 9:21:16 PM
Louisville: Monday Evening News And Notes
9/29/2014 9:20:20 PM
Message Board
 
YBN Widget
RSS Feed  
SCACC Hoops has no affiliation to the NCAA or the ACC
Team logos are trademarks of their respective organizations (more/credits)